Author: Pete Galati
Date: 08:29:22 04/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2000 at 07:46:24, Mike S. wrote: >On April 15, 2000 at 02:58:46, Pete Galati wrote: >>No, I _don't_ find the program that beats >>me the fastest to be the best program, >>I find it the most irritating, and the one I'm least likely to use. It's no >>good to me if it crushes the life out of me before I get a good game going. >>That's not a very interesting game at all. > >But on the other hand, such a program seems to be able to exploit chances you >give to it earlier than others. If you hold out longer against other programs, >you would have to ask yourself, what would the aggressive program have played to >"crush" you as you say... I find programs like Rebel 10 or CSTal II more >challenging right fromthe opening on (after leaving the book lines of course) >than others which play Mr.Sandman chess until I blunder. It a matter of taste. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl Running at their normal strength, most Chess programs will win the game against me, unfortunatly some are too weak to do that. I don't find over aggressive programs to be realistic. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.