Author: blass uri
Date: 10:27:14 04/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2000 at 10:30:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On April 15, 2000 at 06:27:19, Lin Harper wrote: > >> I have to say I'm sceptical about games played with auto player >> software, because more than one person has commented that games played >> manually give quite different results. I've played against earlier >> versions of Fritz and got thrashed quickly. I last longer against >> CM6K, but in a match played manually, CM6K vs Fritz6 on equal hardware, >> my money would be on Chessmaster. > >Lin, > >what you have just written is not a reply to the question asked. What you have >written is just another unveiled piece of defamation of ChessBase programs >without _any_ evidence. It is a shame that so many people consider SSDF and >ChessBase immoral and dishonest. After literally thousands of games played some >people find it profitable (??) to cast doubt on the results obtained by SSDF >without any reproducible examples of what went wrong. I do not think that chessbase is immoral and dishonest and the same for the ssdf but there is a problem with the fact that part of the ssdf games are not public so it is impossible to check if there are errors in the not public games. I do not understand what is the problem of the ssdf to do all the games public. > >If you pursued your bet (CM vs Fritz) you would lose all your money, trust me. I am not sure about it. It is possible that the right personality of chessmaster is better. I do not know. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.