Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:58:01 04/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2000 at 17:14:56, Borges wrote: >On April 15, 2000 at 16:18:04, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On April 15, 2000 at 15:56:18, Borges wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2000 at 12:44:40, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> Hi Christophe! >>> I ran an account in ICC, and was able to get more than 3000 points, with no >>>special hardware. The interesting is that it rans with default settings. It >>>appers no coincidence that when i put NSEW=1 and MoreSel=1 tiger became weak >>>(IMHO). The hashtable I have to set up with 32M in 3 0 games and 64M in 5 0 >>>games, less than this will result in odd endgames, when tiger sometimes put away >>>a victory. >> >> >>You should really check this carefully. Using 32Mb in 3 0 games kills the >>playing strength, I'm sure about this. >> >> >> Christophe > > Actually I prefer to play with 3 0 time controls, I think that the best >evaluation of Chess Tiger makes the difference. It (or he) appears to smokes >everybody. The contempt value, that is useful, to clean a closed position set to >-15 or -20 is helpful. The only colateral effect of this is probably being >noplayed by crafty ;-) But a BOOK editor will make difference. > Congratulation for your program, probably better than you think (intended to >be a joke). > Borges > The only way to get noplayed by crafty is to not read the finger notes. If you can read, you can play it. Feel free. If you can't read, then you will likely get noplayed. But it will have _nothing_ to do with your contempt factor or whatever...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.