Author: blass uri
Date: 00:25:01 04/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2000 at 02:11:59, Chessfun wrote: > >Maybe settings should be called CM6K Jorge less confusion at >a much later date with some CM8K settings. > >Anyway I read the post and stopped the current 100 game match >I had running at 2hrs/40 moves 1 hr rest between CM6000 and CM6666. > >I have thus far played 10 games 1 hr/side game. >Score CM6666 W3 L5 D3 CM8888 W5 L3 D3 looks like CM8888 will also >win game 11. Just did haha. > >For me I have no interest in what is stronger at 15 mins I am more >interested in longer games. Besides which for it to prove to be stronger >than CM 6666 would require a lot more games. For it to prove to be stronger >against other engines is another matter completely, beating CM 6666 don't >mean it will do better against Fritz and the like. Though I did read it had >scored well again the number of games still leaves a large margin of error. I think that the different values for qhite and black queen is illogical. It may help against other programs because they do not understand that counting pawns is not important in queens endgames with passed pawns but I do not expect it to help against chessmaster personalities. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.