Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thunderbird Benchmarked (OT)

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 00:29:19 04/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 15, 2000 at 23:39:04, Eelco de Groot wrote:

>I read some information on Tom's Hardware Guide at
>http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/00q2/000415/roadmap2000-03.html#amds_processor_plans_for_2000
> but it only says there that the core is shrunk and optimized. But I would think
>there must be some more differences than just on die cache because there are
>also new chipsets to be introduced that only work with Thunderbird and up? It is

Maybe it will have new features. But I doubt they can get much more performance
from "optimization" unless they significantly change the core. Maybe a few
percent. More power to them if they can get more.

>not clear if Thunderbird can run with multiple processors with this AMD 770
>chipset, it says that "Mustang" will be able to do that. Maybe the "Spitfire"
>will also be an interesting chip, it will certainly be cheaper than the
>"Thunderbird". It only has 64 kB on die(= on the chip itself) cache though as
>opposed to 256 kB or maybe even 512 kB for the "Thunderbird". Intel's Celeron
>has already 128 kB L2 cache.

I think the Celeron only has 32k L1 cache, for a total of 32 + 128. The Spitfire
will have 128 + 64. So it will still have more, but not by much.

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.