Author: James
Date: 06:44:01 04/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2000 at 02:11:59, Chessfun wrote: > >Maybe settings should be called CM6K Jorge less confusion at >a much later date with some CM8K settings. > >Anyway I read the post and stopped the current 100 game match >I had running at 2hrs/40 moves 1 hr rest between CM6000 and CM6666. > >I have thus far played 10 games 1 hr/side game. >Score CM6666 W3 L5 D3 CM8888 W5 L3 D3 looks like CM8888 will also >win game 11. Just did haha. > >For me I have no interest in what is stronger at 15 mins I am more >interested in longer games. Besides which for it to prove to be stronger >than CM 6666 would require a lot more games. For it to prove to be stronger >against other engines is another matter completely, beating CM 6666 don't >mean it will do better against Fritz and the like. Though I did read it had >scored well again the number of games still leaves a large margin of error. >.....Try your 8888 now against cm default select 10 >These settings however are interesting and clearly seem to perform >well, I myself will run a lot more games with these just to see how good >they are. > >BTW current score in that 100 game match is CM 6666 W 8 L 7 D 10. > >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.