Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM 6666 v CM-Queen+ latest score W8 L14 D9 1hr/game (NT)

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 14:59:53 04/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 17, 2000 at 16:01:45, Chessfun wrote:

>:

I wonder if in any of your games CM Jorge or CM-Queen+  I would prefer to be
called, has ever encountered itself in a position where CM6666 has two Bishops,
a knight plus a pawn Versus CM-Queen+  with a Queen plus a pawn, in such an
ending yesterday I pitted CM6666 Vs CM-Queen+ in a match of 50 games which I
started saturday, in game in 60 minutes per side and my setting thought that it
was winning due to the high value of the Queen, but indeed it was loosing the
endgame, Therefore, I decided to change the value of the OQ to 9.5 Instead of
9.9, but somehow since this position that not occur too often, the new value of
the queen is affecting the final result of other games, therefore, I decided to
change it back to the original seeting of OQ 9.9 and 9.7 respectively. It was
logical to change the value of the Queen to 9.5, since the value of the Bishop
was set up to 3.2 and the knight to 3.1, but somehow the new setting was not
working for the averall percentage score of CM-Queen+.

PS: That is probably the reason why I would prefer to call this controversial
setting the CM-Queen+, due to its peculiar queen setting.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.