Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:03:55 04/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2000 at 17:59:53, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 17, 2000 at 16:01:45, Chessfun wrote: > >>: > >I wonder if in any of your games CM Jorge or CM-Queen+ I would prefer to be >called, has ever encountered itself in a position where CM6666 has two Bishops, >a knight plus a pawn Versus CM-Queen+ with a Queen plus a pawn, in such an >ending yesterday I pitted CM6666 Vs CM-Queen+ in a match of 50 games which I >started saturday, in game in 60 minutes per side and my setting thought that it >was winning due to the high value of the Queen, but indeed it was loosing the >endgame, Therefore, I decided to change the value of the OQ to 9.5 Instead of >9.9, but somehow since this position does not occur too often, the new value of >the queen is affecting the final result of other games, therefore, I decided to >change it back to the original seeting of OQ 9.9 and 9.7 respectively. It was >logical to change the value of the Queen to 9.5, since the value of the Bishop >was set up to 3.2 and the knight to 3.1, but somehow the new setting was not >working for the overall percentage score of CM-Queen+. > >PS: That is probably the reason why I would prefer to call this controversial >setting the CM-Queen+, due to its peculiar queen setting.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.