Author: blass uri
Date: 06:48:32 04/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2000 at 09:23:30, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 19, 2000 at 08:57:58, blass uri wrote: > >>Because it is not the commercial version. > >It should be the commercial version, because that would be fair (sic.). I do not see something unfair in using not the commercial version unless chessbase hides it. I think >that the quad implies that the Fritz developing team and/or Chessbase bought a >"testmatch" from the Dutch Chess Federation. Capitalism strikes again. > >>The commercial version does not run in a quad not because the programmers cannot >>take advantage of a quad but probably because the customers are not interested >>in programs that can use a quad because they have no quad. > >That's not an excuse. A lot of dualboards on the market today, which should be >supported. Probably most of the buyers of Fritz do not use dual boards because this is the only logical explanation for the fact that chessbase did not release a parallel version of Fritz when they had no problem to use a parallel version of Fritz in WCCC and in other tournaments including the match against anand. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.