Author: Vincent Vega
Date: 17:45:51 04/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2000 at 02:36:44, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On April 18, 2000 at 18:02:20, Vincent Vega wrote: > >>On April 18, 2000 at 17:46:06, James Robertson wrote: >> >>[snip] >>> 2: AMD K7, 256 MB PC-100, Win NT >>[snip] >> >>>I am not saying all these guys are cheaters, but it is amazing that an >>>experimental engine on a 100 machine would be rated higher than scrappy. Horka >>>is quite possibly legitimate. It is quite strong too. >>> >>>James >> >>PC-100 is not a processor speed. I doubt AMD even makes K7s that slow. > >He's talking about this one: > >Horka: > >Statistics for Horka(C) (Last disconnected Mon Mar 13, 12:24 CST 2000): > ><SNIP> > > 1: <message> I Experimetal Program of Chess , running Pentium 100 mhz, 16 Mb >RAM ! Nope, Horka is rated lower than Scrappy. He was talking about TurboGM which is rated higher Scrappy.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.