Author: blass uri
Date: 21:18:12 04/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2000 at 23:25:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 19, 2000 at 09:48:32, blass uri wrote: > >>On April 19, 2000 at 09:23:30, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On April 19, 2000 at 08:57:58, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>Because it is not the commercial version. >>> >>>It should be the commercial version, because that would be fair (sic.). >> >> >>I do not see something unfair in using not the commercial version unless >>chessbase hides it. >> > >Isn't this what IBM did with deep blue? Play vs Kasparov with a machine that >no one had any games from? Wasn't this the most common whine about that event, >that Kasparov was playing an unknown machine. > >But it is ok if Fritz does this? > >Guess I don't get it as they sound _identical_. You are right that people have no games of the new Fritz but I think that it is similiar to Fritz6a except the fact that it is about 3 times faster and some small software changes. People have some games of parallel Fritz (for example from WCCC) when kasparov had no games of something similiar to Deep Blue and could not buy something similiar that is only 3 times slower. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.