Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:28:44 04/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2000 at 17:35:01, Chessfun wrote: >On April 20, 2000 at 10:23:07, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Since the Strong.obk Book seems to work better for CMQueen+ I decided to pit it >>in a 1hr/per side game. Using my AHLON 800 Mhz since I am in the process of >>reformating my second P.C. K6-2 500 Mhz. I prefer to use my second AMD K6-2 500 >>Mhz, since most people average to have an equivalent or lesser processor >>nowadays. >> >>[Title "CM-SS10 vs CMQueen+ (using Strong.obk Book)] >>[Game in 60 minutes per side] >>[Date "2000.04.20"] >>[White "CM-SS10"] >>[Black "CMQueen+"] >>[Result "0-1"] >> >> >>1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be6 b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 >>8.f5 c5 9.0-0 Ng4 10.Qe2 Nxe3 11.Qxe3 Nc6 12.d5 Nb4 13.a3 Nxd3 14.Qxd3 a5 >>15.fxg6 hxg6 16.Rfe1 Ba6 17.Qe3 e5 18.a4 f5 19.Nb5 Qd7 20.c4 Bxb5 >>21.axb5 Qe7 22.Ra3 Ra7 23.Rea1 Qf6 24.Rf1 Raf7 25.Nd2 Qh4 26.Qe2 Bh6 >>27.Qh3 Qg5 28.Rd1 Qf4 29.Rg3 Kg7 30.Rd3 Qh4 31.exf5 Bxd2 32.R3xd3 Rxf5 >>33.Rc1 e4 34.Rdc2 Qf6 35.h3 Qd4+ 36.Kh2 Rf2 37.Qg4 e3 38.Rc3 R8f5 >>39.Qg3 e2 40.Re3 Rf1 41.Rc2 Qxe3 42.Qxe3 e1=Q 43.Qxe1 Rxe1 44.b3 Re3 >>45.Rb2 Rf1 46.h4 Rf4 47.Kg1 Re1+ 48.Kh2 Rxh4+ 49.Kg3 Rhh1 50.Kf4 Rb1 >>51.Re2 Rhe1 52.Re6 Rxe6 53.dxe6 Rxb3 54.e7 Kf7 55.Ke4 a4 56.Kd5 a3 >>57.Kc6 Kxe7 58.Kxb6 Kd7 59.g3 a2 60.Kb7 a1=Q 61.g4 Qa5 62.g5 Qc7+ >>63 Ka6 Ra3++ 0-1 >> >>PS: From now on I will only use the Strong.obk Book with the CMQueen+ setting, >>since it seems to be the best Book available in Chessmater 6000 Books Library, >>but later on I will test the Mentor.obk which has an even larger Book but not >>necessarily the best. > > >This is just one game. >I assumed you had already tested with the anand book. >CM 6666 v CMQueen+ anandV W 14 L 6 D 5 >The CM6K book was made for the 6000 so I'll stick with that >as that is the most tuned book. > >Thanks. Yes I already have done some test with the Anand book and they are too close to decide which is stronger. By coincidence you left this original book of CM6000 when you decided to test my setting which I am very glad that you did and it turn out that it is a better book than Anand book in CM6000 bokk library. Therefore, it is more appropriate to calle it CMQueen+ since you finally made the final adjustment to my setting. I do notice that in order to test which setting is stronger, you either test is without a book, and I believe CM6000 has an option called nobook.obk or either lowbook.obk I will have to check just to make sure I believe it has only 1k and this is to allow CM6000 to pick the first move and then it play by itself from that point on. And the other option to find which setting is the stronger, ia to select the same opening book for both setting, which you already have done in your first testing, the only incovenience of this choice is that it produces too many duplicated games. But either way you choose, it will let you know which setting is the strongest without the advantage of one opening book being better than the other. These two different tests, which is giving you two different results so far clearly has demonstrated that a good opening book can affect tremendously the rating performance of any program. Therefore Fritz 6 just by having a better opening book can easily outperform Junior 6 for instance in the first 10 ten moves which from that point on it is very hard for the other programs to take the lead and finally win the game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.