Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:34:50 04/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2000 at 21:28:44, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 20, 2000 at 17:35:01, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 20, 2000 at 10:23:07, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Since the Strong.obk Book seems to work better for CMQueen+ I decided to pit it >>>in a 1hr/per side game. Using my AHLON 800 Mhz since I am in the process of >>>reformating my second P.C. K6-2 500 Mhz. I prefer to use my second AMD K6-2 500 >>>Mhz, since most people average to have an equivalent or lesser processor >>>nowadays. >>> >>>[Title "CM-SS10 vs CMQueen+ (using Strong.obk Book)] >>>[Game in 60 minutes per side] >>>[Date "2000.04.20"] >>>[White "CM-SS10"] >>>[Black "CMQueen+"] >>>[Result "0-1"] >>> >>> >>>1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be6 b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 >>>8.f5 c5 9.0-0 Ng4 10.Qe2 Nxe3 11.Qxe3 Nc6 12.d5 Nb4 13.a3 Nxd3 14.Qxd3 a5 >>>15.fxg6 hxg6 16.Rfe1 Ba6 17.Qe3 e5 18.a4 f5 19.Nb5 Qd7 20.c4 Bxb5 >>>21.axb5 Qe7 22.Ra3 Ra7 23.Rea1 Qf6 24.Rf1 Raf7 25.Nd2 Qh4 26.Qe2 Bh6 >>>27.Qh3 Qg5 28.Rd1 Qf4 29.Rg3 Kg7 30.Rd3 Qh4 31.exf5 Bxd2 32.R3xd3 Rxf5 >>>33.Rc1 e4 34.Rdc2 Qf6 35.h3 Qd4+ 36.Kh2 Rf2 37.Qg4 e3 38.Rc3 R8f5 >>>39.Qg3 e2 40.Re3 Rf1 41.Rc2 Qxe3 42.Qxe3 e1=Q 43.Qxe1 Rxe1 44.b3 Re3 >>>45.Rb2 Rf1 46.h4 Rf4 47.Kg1 Re1+ 48.Kh2 Rxh4+ 49.Kg3 Rhh1 50.Kf4 Rb1 >>>51.Re2 Rhe1 52.Re6 Rxe6 53.dxe6 Rxb3 54.e7 Kf7 55.Ke4 a4 56.Kd5 a3 >>>57.Kc6 Kxe7 58.Kxb6 Kd7 59.g3 a2 60.Kb7 a1=Q 61.g4 Qa5 62.g5 Qc7+ >>>63 Ka6 Ra3++ 0-1 >>> >>>PS: From now on I will only use the Strong.obk Book with the CMQueen+ setting, >>>since it seems to be the best Book available in Chessmater 6000 Books Library, >>>but later on I will test the Mentor.obk which has an even larger Book but not >>>necessarily the best. >> >> >>This is just one game. >>I assumed you had already tested with the anand book. >>CM 6666 v CMQueen+ anandV W 14 L 6 D 5 >>The CM6K book was made for the 6000 so I'll stick with that >>as that is the most tuned book. >> >>Thanks. > >Yes I already have done some test with the Anand book and they are too close to >decide which is stronger. By coincidence you left this original book of CM6000 >when you decided to test my setting which I am very glad that you did and it >turn out that it is a better book than Anand book in CM6000 book library. >Therefore, it is more appropriate to call it CMQueen+ since you finally made >the final adjustment to my setting. I do notice that in order to test which >setting is stronger, you either test is without a book, and I believe CM6000 >has an option called nobook.obk or either lowbook.obk I will have to check just >to make sure I believe it has only 1k and this is to allow CM6000 to pick the >first move and then it play by itself from that point on. And the other option >to find which setting is the stronger, is to select the same opening book for >both settings, which you already have done in your first testing, the only >incovenience of this choice is that it produces too many duplicated games. But >either way you choose, it will let you know which setting is the strongest >without the advantage of one opening book being better than the other. These two >different tests, which is giving you two different results so far clearly has >demonstrated that a good opening book can affect tremendously the rating >performance of any program. Therefore Fritz 6 just by having a better opening >book can easily outperform Junior 6 for instance in the first 10 ten moves >which from that point on it is very hard for the other programs to take the lead >and finally win the game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.