Author: Pete Galati
Date: 23:44:25 04/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 2000 at 01:19:31, Paulo Soares wrote: >On April 21, 2000 at 00:43:00, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Even though fritz does a good job, I think hiarcs is easier to follow. >>I too use computer mainly for analysis, and more often I use hiarcs.It gives the >>3 best lines, and has more knowledge than fritz. > >In my opinion, Hiarcs7.32 it's better than Hiarcs7.01 for analyses, >because you can choose n best lines and the gui is better, with more >options. I have Hiarcs7.01 and Hiarcs7.32 and I too use programs >mainly for analyses. > >Paulo Is Hiarcs 7.01 the Dos/Mac program that doesn't come from Chessbase? That program interests me, not because it's not from Chessbase, but because it runs in Dos and from what I hear is exceptionally strong. I emailed them to the email address at their site monday but haven't heard from them yet. I thought it was rather odd that I didn't find any screen shots of their interface at their site. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.