Author: Laurence Chen
Date: 08:26:16 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2000 at 10:51:27, Pierre Bourget wrote: >Is it true in this position that Hiarcs play Qf7+ ?? because of the tablebase ? >Isn't it a little ridiculous.Look here for Tim Krabbe opinion: > >http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary.htm > >[D]5k2/2Q5/8/8/5p2/5P2/5P2/K7 w - - 0 1 What's your point then? I do this type of move against a human player, there reason why I do such thing is that the human player is too stubborn to resign, hence, he is asking for humiliation, and wants to take a long beating. So why not!!!! I find playing against this type of position against a human player who does not want to resign in a totally hopeless position, then he deserves to be torture to a slow death. I approve Hiarcs move, it still mates the opponent in 25 moves. A mate is a mate no matter how many moves. A win is a win. Laurence
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.