Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer can't play chess

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 08:26:16 04/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 22, 2000 at 10:51:27, Pierre Bourget wrote:

>Is it true in this position that Hiarcs play Qf7+ ?? because of the tablebase ?
>Isn't it a little ridiculous.Look here for Tim Krabbe opinion:
>
>http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary.htm
>
>[D]5k2/2Q5/8/8/5p2/5P2/5P2/K7 w - - 0 1
What's your point then?  I do this type of move against a human player, there
reason why I do such thing is that the human player is too stubborn to resign,
hence, he is asking for humiliation, and wants to take a long beating. So why
not!!!!  I find playing against this type of position against a human player who
does not want to resign in a totally hopeless position, then he deserves to be
torture to a slow death.  I approve Hiarcs move, it still mates the opponent in
25 moves.  A mate is a mate no matter how many moves. A win is a win.
Laurence




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.