Author: Pete Galati
Date: 16:15:20 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2000 at 18:27:14, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 22, 2000 at 14:46:28, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On April 22, 2000 at 15:02:19, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:49:59, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:20:57, A.L.Mourik wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hello dear CCC friends, >>>>> >>>>>Although earlier reports from e.g. Jouni Uski, suggest an enormous increase in >>>>>strenght for Crafty 17.10 >>>>>Nuun 2 match result Fritz6 against Crafty 17.10 ends in a very clear >>>>>29,5-10,5!! victory for Fritz6. >>>>>Played on PII 400 8mb for HT, Timecontrol 5 min + 3 sec per move. >>>> >>>>There isn't generally an enormous increase in strength from version to version >>>>of any program, that's unrealistic to expect there to be. >>>> >>>>Your time controls are a bit short there. >>>> >>>>Pete >>> >>> >>>Why didn't you say or ask that of Jouni when he posted? >>>as all he said was blitz, that may even have been faster >>>than this. >>>Thanks. >> >>Sorry, I don't read all posts, this one caught my eye because it was at the top >>of the board. >> >>If Jouni played some games this fast or faster, then my opinion would be the >>same, it's too fast. That isn't to say that I have not run games at that speed, >>I have, and they were too fast to judge the strength of a program. >> >>Pete > > > >Why? > >Can you please explain why? > >You must certainly have some evidence? > > > Christophe Why? Why what? Your question is far too vague. Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.