Author: Chessfun
Date: 21:32:45 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2000 at 17:25:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 22, 2000 at 14:46:28, Pete Galati wrote: > > >>Sorry, I don't read all posts, this one caught my eye because it was at the top >>of the board. >> >>If Jouni played some games this fast or faster, then my opinion would be the >>same, it's too fast. That isn't to say that I have not run games at that speed, >>I have, and they were too fast to judge the strength of a program. > >I agree. As far as I know the development of Crafty is aimed at improving its >strength at tournament time control. Nunn blitz matches are insignificant in my >humble opinion. On top of that it's almost impossible to make any sound >conclusions based on these results, except that Fritz6 appears to be stronger at >blitz. I don't think it's possible to say anything about 17.07 vs. 17.10. > >Best wishes... >Mogens I generally agree the results of fast blitz games mean very little. Though as with humans maybe we should have blitz type results by someone like the SSDF it is still an interesting subject. Funny how knowone said anything about blitz being bad when Jouni posted that on his machine at nunn 1 crafty scored better than F6. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.