Author: Chessfun
Date: 22:38:20 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2000 at 01:31:17, Pete Galati wrote: >On April 23, 2000 at 00:48:44, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 22, 2000 at 14:46:28, Pete Galati wrote: >> >>>On April 22, 2000 at 15:02:19, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:49:59, Pete Galati wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:20:57, A.L.Mourik wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hello dear CCC friends, >>>>>> >>>>>>Although earlier reports from e.g. Jouni Uski, suggest an enormous increase in >>>>>>strenght for Crafty 17.10 >>>>>>Nuun 2 match result Fritz6 against Crafty 17.10 ends in a very clear >>>>>>29,5-10,5!! victory for Fritz6. >>>>>>Played on PII 400 8mb for HT, Timecontrol 5 min + 3 sec per move. >>>>> >>>>>There isn't generally an enormous increase in strength from version to version >>>>>of any program, that's unrealistic to expect there to be. >>>>> >>>>>Your time controls are a bit short there. >>>>> >>>>>Pete >>>> >>>> >>>>Why didn't you say or ask that of Jouni when he posted? >>>>as all he said was blitz, that may even have been faster >>>>than this. >>>>Thanks. >>> >>>Sorry, I don't read all posts, this one caught my eye because it was at the top >>>of the board. >> >> >>You had posted in the thread I referred to. >>Which was Sensation Crafty 17-10 beats F6a in nunn1 . >> > >You'd need to post the html of the post where I responded to that, setting the >filters at 7 days and doing a search for "Sensation Crafty 17-10" does not turn >anything up. I don't recall responding in such a thread. But if you're >attempting to put me on trial for some comment that I may or may not have made >about Crafty, then you simply have too much time on your hands. It is fairly simple to set search for author. You made no comment for a trial, it was the lack of request for the time control of the blitz games then the statement in this thread that it needs longer time controls. But, since your last comment obviously means you take every question of your postings as an offense and feel the need to take a stab at anyone who questions anything you write, even the obvious questions posed by Christophe that you fail to understand, then don't worry I won't bother to reply in future. Thanks. >Pete > >> >>>If Jouni played some games this fast or faster, then my opinion would be the >>>same, it's too fast. That isn't to say that I have not run games at that speed, >>>I have, and they were too fast to judge the strength of a program. >> >> >>None of the Crafty supporters (for lack of a better word) at that >>point asked what the time control was or made the statement that >>it's optimized for longer time controls. >> >>All posting took the results at face value, wheras IMO the result >>is not possible nor reproducable, that is once the actual time control >>that produced those results is stated. >> >>If I find otherwise naturally I would retract that statement. >> >>Thanks. >> >> >> >> >>>Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.