Author: Pete Galati
Date: 22:53:55 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2000 at 01:38:20, Chessfun wrote: >On April 23, 2000 at 01:31:17, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On April 23, 2000 at 00:48:44, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:46:28, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On April 22, 2000 at 15:02:19, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:49:59, Pete Galati wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:20:57, A.L.Mourik wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello dear CCC friends, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Although earlier reports from e.g. Jouni Uski, suggest an enormous increase in >>>>>>>strenght for Crafty 17.10 >>>>>>>Nuun 2 match result Fritz6 against Crafty 17.10 ends in a very clear >>>>>>>29,5-10,5!! victory for Fritz6. >>>>>>>Played on PII 400 8mb for HT, Timecontrol 5 min + 3 sec per move. >>>>>> >>>>>>There isn't generally an enormous increase in strength from version to version >>>>>>of any program, that's unrealistic to expect there to be. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your time controls are a bit short there. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pete >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Why didn't you say or ask that of Jouni when he posted? >>>>>as all he said was blitz, that may even have been faster >>>>>than this. >>>>>Thanks. >>>> >>>>Sorry, I don't read all posts, this one caught my eye because it was at the top >>>>of the board. >>> >>> >>>You had posted in the thread I referred to. >>>Which was Sensation Crafty 17-10 beats F6a in nunn1 . >>> >> >>You'd need to post the html of the post where I responded to that, setting the >>filters at 7 days and doing a search for "Sensation Crafty 17-10" does not turn >>anything up. I don't recall responding in such a thread. But if you're >>attempting to put me on trial for some comment that I may or may not have made >>about Crafty, then you simply have too much time on your hands. > > >It is fairly simple to set search for author. >You made no comment for a trial, it was the lack of request >for the time control of the blitz games then the statement in >this thread that it needs longer time controls. > >But, since your last comment obviously means you take every question >of your postings as an offense and feel the need to take a stab at >anyone who questions anything you write, even the obvious questions >posed by Christophe that you fail to understand, then don't worry I >won't bother to reply in future. > >Thanks. > Ok, I searched for "Jouni" and found what you're talking about, but you left out a ":" when you quoted the name of the thread so my search didn't turn up anything. First of all, in that thread, I was responding to a comment that Fernando made, not anything that Jouni said. Second, I didn't take back anything. Third, Christophe was not being clear what he was asking "why" about. And Forth, if you don't care for the way I respond to a post, then don't read my posts, I'm not likely to change just to suit you, and I'm not the least bit concerned about your replying to anything I post in the future. Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.