Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:23:43 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2000 at 02:15:54, Heinz-Josef Schumacher wrote:
>Fritz6a wins AMD-Tournament
>
>1xAMD K6-3/400, max. 64 MB RAM Hash Tables, 2 GB Table Bases, big Liberies,
>Autoplayer, without Permanent Brain, time controlls: 30 Moves in 2 hours.
>Operator: Heinz-Josef Schumacher, hjs@redseven.de
>
>Programms:
>Fritz 6 (a) Powerbooks 2000 64 MB Hash
>Hiarcs 7.32 New General H7.32 Book 64 MB Hash
>Junior 6 (a) Junior Book 64 MB Hash
>Nimzo 7.32 Nimzo Book 64 MB Hash + 11 MB
>"N-Endgame-Tables"
>Shredder 4 Shredder Book 48 MB Hash + 16 MB
>Assessment Tables
>Tiger 12e Main Opening Book 64 MB Hash
>
>Results after 50. Rounds:
>1. Fritz 6a 29:21
>2.-3. Hiarcs 7.32 26½:23½
> Shredder 4 26½:23½
>4. Junior 6a 23:27
>5.-6. Nimzo 7.32 22½:27½
> Tiger 12e 22½:27½
>
>Games : 150 (finished)
>White Wins : 55 (36.7 %)
>Black Wins : 36 (24.0 %)
>Draws : 59 (39.3 %)
>Unfinished : 0
>
>White Perf. : 56.3 %
> Black Perf. : 43.7 %
>
>
>ELO-Stat.(many thanks to Frank Schubert for his great ELO-programm!):
>
>Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
>1 Fritz 6 : 2747 91 74 50 58.0 % 2691
>2 Hiarcs 7.32 : 2717 98 69 50 53.0 % 2696
>3 Shredder 4 : 2717 98 69 50 53.0 % 2696
>4 Junior 6.0 : 2677 71 96 50 46.0 % 2705
>5 Nimzo 7.32 : 2671 63 95 50 45.0 % 2706
>6 Tiger 12e : 2671 67 95 50 45.0 % 2706
>
>Individual statistics:
>
>(1) Fritz 6 : 50 (+ 20,= 18,- 12), 58.0 %
>
>Tiger 12e : 10 (+ 5,= 2,- 3), 60.0 %
>Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 %
>Shredder 4 : 10 (+ 5,= 3,- 2), 65.0 %
>Junior 6.0 : 10 (+ 3,= 5,- 2), 55.0 %
>Nimzo 7.32 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 %
>
>
>(2) Hiarcs 7.32 : 50 (+ 17,= 19,- 14), 53.0 %
>
>Fritz 6 : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 %
>Tiger 12e : 10 (+ 5,= 3,- 2), 65.0 %
>Shredder 4 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 %
>Junior 6.0 : 10 (+ 3,= 3,- 4), 45.0 %
>Nimzo 7.32 : 10 (+ 2,= 5,- 3), 45.0 %
>
>
>(3) Shredder 4 : 50 (+ 17,= 19,- 14), 53.0 %
>
>Fritz 6 : 10 (+ 2,= 3,- 5), 35.0 %
>Tiger 12e : 10 (+ 5,= 4,- 1), 70.0 %
>Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 2,= 4,- 4), 40.0 %
>Junior 6.0 : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 %
>Nimzo 7.32 : 10 (+ 5,= 4,- 1), 70.0 %
>
>
>(4) Junior 6.0 : 50 (+ 14,= 18,- 18), 46.0 %
>
>Fritz 6 : 10 (+ 2,= 5,- 3), 45.0 %
>Tiger 12e : 10 (+ 2,= 4,- 4), 40.0 %
>Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 4,= 3,- 3), 55.0 %
>Shredder 4 : 10 (+ 3,= 4,- 3), 50.0 %
>Nimzo 7.32 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 %
>
>
>(5) Nimzo 7.32 : 50 (+ 11,= 23,- 16), 45.0 %
>
>Fritz 6 : 10 (+ 2,= 4,- 4), 40.0 %
>Tiger 12e : 10 (+ 0,= 8,- 2), 40.0 %
>Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 3,= 5,- 2), 55.0 %
>Shredder 4 : 10 (+ 1,= 4,- 5), 30.0 %
>Junior 6.0 : 10 (+ 5,= 2,- 3), 60.0 %
>
>
>(6) Tiger 12e : 50 (+ 12,= 21,- 17), 45.0 %
>
>Fritz 6 : 10 (+ 3,= 2,- 5), 40.0 %
>Hiarcs 7.32 : 10 (+ 2,= 3,- 5), 35.0 %
>Shredder 4 : 10 (+ 1,= 4,- 5), 30.0 %
>Junior 6.0 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 %
>Nimzo 7.32 : 10 (+ 2,= 8,- 0), 60.0 %
>
>
>Fritz 6a seems to be much better than the older version or Fritz 5.32 and is at
>the moment the strongest program. Shredder 4 has the best GUI and plays a strong
>and good Chess. The style of S4 is much better than the older S3, because it
>plays much aggressiver. Hiarcs 7.32 is not yet an oldie and was the big surprise
>at this tournament. Perhaps it plays much better at the K6-3 or were the great
>results here only a random!? Junior 6a was the negative surprise; it seems to
>play on longer time controlls much weaker as general except or plays it better
>on Intel!? Nimzo 7.32 disapointed once more, but it is much stronger in endgames
>than the older Nimzo 2000 or N99. Tiger 12e is a strong and impressive newcomer,
>but with too little theory. The Opening Book is too small and the table bases
>for the endgames are not supported.
Hi Heinz,
Is it possible to download these games anywhere?
Thanks for posting your results. !!
Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.