Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:37:13 04/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2000 at 02:31:28, Pete Galati wrote:
>On April 23, 2000 at 02:12:19, Chessfun wrote:
>>>Third, Christophe was not being clear what he was asking "why" about.
>>
>>The question he asked is simple enough. You said these blitz times were
>>too fast and that they are too fast to judge the strength of a program.
>>He asked, why and can you explain. Since you had made these statements
>>you must have evidence that these statements are correct.
>>Seems simple to me.
>
>No, _you're_ asking that question, Christophe didn't, he wasn't clear what he
>was asking about. Blitz games don't allow a program to search deep enough,
>that's obvious enough that the question does not need to be asked.
Cut and paste:
Why?
Can you please explain why?
You must certainly have some evidence?
Christophe
That looks clear enough to me and seems to be what I had wrote.
Certainly easy enough to see what he is asking.
Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.