Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 01:01:13 04/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 22, 2000 at 19:15:20, Pete Galati wrote:
>On April 22, 2000 at 18:27:14, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:46:28, Pete Galati wrote:
>>
>>>On April 22, 2000 at 15:02:19, Chessfun wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:49:59, Pete Galati wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 22, 2000 at 14:20:57, A.L.Mourik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hello dear CCC friends,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Although earlier reports from e.g. Jouni Uski, suggest an enormous increase in
>>>>>>strenght for Crafty 17.10
>>>>>>Nuun 2 match result Fritz6 against Crafty 17.10 ends in a very clear
>>>>>>29,5-10,5!! victory for Fritz6.
>>>>>>Played on PII 400 8mb for HT, Timecontrol 5 min + 3 sec per move.
>>>>>
>>>>>There isn't generally an enormous increase in strength from version to version
>>>>>of any program, that's unrealistic to expect there to be.
>>>>>
>>>>>Your time controls are a bit short there.
>>>>>
>>>>>Pete
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Why didn't you say or ask that of Jouni when he posted?
>>>>as all he said was blitz, that may even have been faster
>>>>than this.
>>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>Sorry, I don't read all posts, this one caught my eye because it was at the top
>>>of the board.
>>>
>>>If Jouni played some games this fast or faster, then my opinion would be the
>>>same, it's too fast. That isn't to say that I have not run games at that speed,
>>>I have, and they were too fast to judge the strength of a program.
>>>
>>>Pete
>>
>>
>>
>>Why?
>>
>>Can you please explain why?
>>
>>You must certainly have some evidence?
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>Why? Why what? Your question is far too vague.
>
>Pete
Why is it too fast to judge the strength of a program?
Give your evidence.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.