Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 01:15:48 04/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2000 at 00:43:49, Chessfun wrote:
>On April 22, 2000 at 18:35:45, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 22, 2000 at 13:13:00, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Since I never got a reply on what those blitz times were on the
>>>previous thread, I played 1 min game, 2 min game, 3 min game and
>>>5 min game.
>>>
>>>I was surprized to read that Crafty 17-10 could beat Fritz 6a
>>>in Nunn 1 blitz as no previous version I had was close.
>>>
>>>All games on Cel 433.
>>>Anyone wanting the games email me.
>>>
>>>1 min game Fritz 6a 14.5 - 5.5 Crafty 17-10
>>>2 min game Fritz 6a 14.5 - 5.5 Crafty 17-10
>>>3 min game Fritz 6a 13.0 - 7.0 Crafty 17-10
>>>5 min game Fritz 6a 15.5 - 4.5 Crafty 17-10
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>>That's a very interesting experiment. Please, keep on playing with longer time
>>controls.
>>
>>I'm interested in knowing how programs behave when you change the time controls.
>>
>>Let's see if the result change drastically with much longer time controls.
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>I have played 10 mins (it's posted now I'm trying 25 then will finish
>at 60 mins.
>
>The original intent was I did not believe the post:
>Sensation Crafty 17-10 beats F6 at nunn 1.
>
>Still don't believe it, don't believe the results or the
>games could ever be reporduced.
>
>The hype around the post was all of course it's natural,
>then when F6 wins it's, well, it's only blitz.
>
>Crafty is a fine program, but sometimes there is IMO
>a little bit too much of biased hype surrounding it's
>results.
>
>Thanks.
I bet that you'll get the same result (inside the mathematical error margin),
whatever time control you use.
Christophe
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.