Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:29:44 04/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 23, 2000 at 00:32:45, Chessfun wrote: >On April 22, 2000 at 17:25:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On April 22, 2000 at 14:46:28, Pete Galati wrote: >> >> >>>Sorry, I don't read all posts, this one caught my eye because it was at the top >>>of the board. >>> >>>If Jouni played some games this fast or faster, then my opinion would be the >>>same, it's too fast. That isn't to say that I have not run games at that speed, >>>I have, and they were too fast to judge the strength of a program. >> >>I agree. As far as I know the development of Crafty is aimed at improving its >>strength at tournament time control. Nunn blitz matches are insignificant in my >>humble opinion. On top of that it's almost impossible to make any sound >>conclusions based on these results, except that Fritz6 appears to be stronger at >>blitz. I don't think it's possible to say anything about 17.07 vs. 17.10. >> >>Best wishes... >>Mogens > > >I generally agree the results of fast blitz games mean very little. >Though as with humans maybe we should have blitz type results by >someone like the SSDF it is still an interesting subject. > >Funny how knowone said anything about blitz being bad when Jouni posted >that on his machine at nunn 1 crafty scored better than F6. > >Thanks. If you will go back to the beginning of that thread, post #2 was by me. I said "I suspect the results will be different if more games are played..." I know what to take with a grain of salt, and what to take as base fact.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.