Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ICC Computer Chess Detection Techniques

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:27:36 04/23/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 23, 2000 at 12:43:55, James Robertson wrote:

>On April 23, 2000 at 03:29:30, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On April 23, 2000 at 01:30:59, James Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>On April 23, 2000 at 00:19:33, Jerry Adams wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Hello
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I would think with all the knowledgable programmers here someone could give me
>>>>some information on ICC Computer Cheating Detection techniques. My interest is
>>>>pure curiosity. Some people have told me that they used to be able to cheat for
>>>>several months before getting busted, now it seems that cheaters are identified
>>>>almost immediately. Has ICC developed some new Software to detect Programs
>>>>running in the Background? If so, How would they indentify these programs as
>>>>Chess Software?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>I think the quick detection is due to the fact that large bands of suspicious
>>>people think everyone rated over 2000 is cheating.  As a result they invariably
>>>catch cheaters. :)
>>>
>>>(Note: this is a slight exaggeration of their techniques.)
>>>
>>>James
>>
>>If someone is using a computer in an intelligent way it is impossible to catch
>>him(her).
>>I do not see a way to catch someone who use computer to help him(her) only for
>>part of the moves in every game and does not use the same program all the time.
>>
>>If someone follow the moves of one program all the time then it is easy to prove
>>it.
>>For example if there are 100 moves in a row that can be reproduced by crafty
>>than it is clear that crafty was used.
>>
>>Uri
>
>I think it is also possible to create a program that uses time very irregularly
>(for instance if a move looks to be good immediately, take a risk that it is
>obvious and make it) and occasionally make mistakes. Such a program would be
>almost impossible to catch based on most detection methods (lack of blunders,
>regular time use).
>
>James


This wouldn't be hard to catch.  Regular time/move is just _one_ thing we look
for.  There are many other 'signatures' on a computer-user...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.