Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty 17.10 not that strong

Author: Marcus Kaestner

Date: 23:59:29 04/23/00

Go up one level in this thread


>
>Maybe the argument is not valid for Tiger but the argument is valid
>for a lot of other chess programs. Genius was a good example 3-4
>years ago. Nimzo, Rebel doing much better on long time control than
>on blitz. IMO the latter is also true for Crafty, I assume Bob will
>comment this. Also all of this is also true for Mchess.
>
>Speaking for Rebel: I NEVER trust (and never will trust) the blitz
>results of Rebel as blitz isn't my goal. This might be different for
>other programmers who consider blitz as important. For me a perfect
>explanation why this difference exists among chess programs.
>
>Ed

you´ve got it exactly, ed.

marcus



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.