Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 09:16:05 04/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2000 at 09:35:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 24, 2000 at 03:45:50, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On April 24, 2000 at 00:13:04, Pete Galati wrote: >> >>>That's only your take on the matter, read this post, Bob sums up the situation >>>very well, but you don't appear to have a good grasp on it from what I can tell >>> >>>http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?107372 >>> >>>Pete >> >>Er, Christophe might not have a good grasp of the situation, but why are you >>assuming that Bob does? >> >>-Tom > > >Perhaps because I (and a couple of others) mentioned _real_ cases of where >programs catch up to (and pass) their opposition as time controls are lengthened >or shortened??? I'm sure a number of _real_ cases can be found where the results of a blitz match accurately predict the results of a standard match. You can't disprove one side by proving the other side. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.