Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty not that strong (2)

Author: blass uri

Date: 13:37:40 04/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On April 24, 2000 at 16:06:55, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On April 24, 2000 at 15:01:22, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 24, 2000 at 14:42:36, A.L.Mourik wrote:
>>
>>>Hello to everyone,
>>>
>>>Two days ago I played a Nunn 2 match between Fritz 6 and Crafty 17.10.
>>>This whether to check if Crafty as supposed by e.g Jouni Uski was really as good
>>>as been told .
>>>
>>>The result in a Nunn 2 match that I held was disappointing because it ended in a
>>>clear 29,5 - 10,5 victory for Fritz6.
>>>Timelevel 5min +3 sec. PII 400 each 8 MB HT, pondering off.
>>>The only reason that I played a Nunn 2 Match between these two engines, was to
>>>TEST which program under equal circumstances, as in this case in the Fritz6 gui,
>>>scored the best. This as an indication of the ?chesspower? of that engine.
>>>Imho these are the best circumstances with one computer to tell which program
>>>produces the best chess.
>>>
>>>You can?t argue on the fact that the circumstances for the given engines were
>>>not the same.
>>>As far as I can see it, your only real point is the presumption, that Crafty
>>>does a better time saving in the pondering on mode, than Fritz6.
>>>So I agree that with testing on two different computers and with both programs
>>>pondering on, this presumed negative effect for Crafty would be neutralised.
>>>On the other hand I wonder what Morsch or other respectable programmers opinion
>>>on these presumption is.
>>
>>
>>
>>I'm not sure I am a respectable chess programmer, but I want to ask something:
>>
>>Why is Crafty's management of pondering supposed to be superior to Fritz'?
>>
>>Why is pondering=off supposed to handicap Crafty more than Fritz?
>>
>>Who can seriously believe that Frans Morsch is so lousy that he cannot take
>>advantage of pondering as well as Bob does?
>>
>>
>>    Christophe
>>
>Your question is _bass-ackward_ in it's phrasing.  It should be "who would not
>believe that Frans has spent more time testing with ponder=off than bob has,
>so that it isn't a surprise that fritz probably does a better job of allocating
>time in that mode than crafty does?"
>
>_that_ is the point.  Not that I am better with ponder=on.  That I am _worse_
>with ponder = off.  How hard is that to understand???

I do not think that you are worse with ponder=off.
I do not think that Frans wasted a lot of time about ponder=off games.

The important games for him including ssdf games are with ponder=on

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.