Author: Chessfun
Date: 01:43:28 04/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2000 at 04:36:54, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 25, 2000 at 04:23:32, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>Not only are you answering the question "can blitz matches predict the outcomes >>of standard matches," you're also seeing if Crafty is crippled by ponder=off. > >I don't think you're right about that. There isn't enough games to make any >conclusion, I agree not enough games. >except that Fritz6 appears to be stronger that Crafty 17.10 at >different timesettings with ponder off and without the use of an opening book. >If you assume that ponder off cripples Crafty. No assumption, Dr. Hyatt says it does. > It would fair to assume that >importance of the time allocation problem would change from blitz to standard, >thereby rendering the comparison useless. An interesting point though the same could also be true of F6a. >The test with ponder on using two >machines would indeed be interesting, even though I can't see why Nunn >positions >need to be used. Nunn 1 was originally used as that was what Jouni posted with Crafty beating F6a. I had played IMO enough games at Nunn 1 to question if this was possible as IMO it wasn't. >>Very nice work. > >Yes, indeed. TY Thanks. >Best wishes... >Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.