Author: Chessfun
Date: 01:56:05 04/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2000 at 04:23:32, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On April 25, 2000 at 04:13:44, Chessfun wrote: > >>Thus far: >>All games on one Cel 433. >>Ponder=off. >>Tablebases used at 25 and 60 mins. >>Nunn 1 positions. >>No opening books are loaded. >> >> 1 min game Fritz 6a 14.5 - 5.5 Crafty 17-10 >> 2 min game Fritz 6a 14.5 - 5.5 Crafty 17-10 >> 3 min game Fritz 6a 13.0 - 7.0 Crafty 17-10 >> 5 min game Fritz 6a 15.5 - 4.5 Crafty 17-10 >>10 min game Fritz 6a 13.0 - 7.0 Crafty 17-10 >>25 min game Fritz 6a 13.0 - 7.0 Crafty 17-10 >>60 min game Fritz 6a 15.5 - 4.5 Crafty 17-10 >> >>Tourney times 120'/40 + 60'/20 + 30' >>is now running on two computers 1-10 on one >>11-20 on the other. >> >> >>At the completion of this match I will autoplay >>on two Cel 433's the same time controls with ponder=on. >> >>Thanks. > >This is some truly awesome stuff. > >Not only are you answering the question "can blitz matches predict the outcomes >of standard matches, My own opinion is they can within naturally a certain margin of error. That margin is anyones guess. I would like to see the SSDF with a seperate list for blitz and standard, but then you naturally have the ponder question. Personally I think a lot is made of this ponder issue I don't see how any single program is more affected than another by lack of ponder, but that just my opinion. >" you're also seeing if Crafty is crippled by ponder=off. Again I guess with the small amount of games it will produce a result that can naturally be taken with a pinch of salt as the batch total of games is minimal. As I said above I don't believe Crafty is crippled more than any other program. >Very nice work. Thanks. >-Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.