Author: blass uri
Date: 05:15:32 04/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2000 at 06:25:27, David Blackman wrote: >I'd like to see as many events as possible for the next few years, with both >humans and computers in the event. However i don't think this is a good thing in >a national championship. There should be separate human/computer events instead, >provided a sponsor can be found. > >I think human/computer events have a future of only a few more years though. >After that the computers will just be too good. I hope someone can arrange a >couple more Aegon or Harvard Cup style events before it's too late. Or even a 12 >round robin, 6 humans, 6 different computers, 11 rounds. I think that by chenging the rules we can help humans also later without changing the fact that it is a fair game. For example we can let both sides to take back moves when for every take back you get less 1 minute and your opponent get 1 minute more. There is no reason to stop human-computer events unless computers can win humans in every game that humans can play. The question is when the programmers are going to be good enough. If they are good enough they can develop a program to beat the world champion for every game that humans can play. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.