Author: blass uri
Date: 07:27:45 04/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2000 at 10:25:46, blass uri wrote: >On April 25, 2000 at 10:10:09, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On April 25, 2000 at 08:25:22, blass uri wrote: >> >>>Some programs do not know important information about simple endgames because >>>the programmers assume that tablebases will help them. >> >>Chessfun said the same and I guess that's true. >> >>>You cannot say the same about opening books because you can get a similiar >>>position that is going to be out of book so programs have to know to play >>>without opening book otherwise they may have problems against opponents who try >>>to get them out of book. >> >>I think that a lot of programs will have problems making good opening moves >>without a book. There was a good example from the DJ-Xie Jun match. I wonder how >>a tournament without an opening book would turn out. >> >>Best wishes... >>Mogens > >You are right and it is one of the reasons that I expect deep Junior to have >problems against humans when they will try to get it out of book. > >Uri I should write this is the reason and not this is one of the reason because I did not think about other reasons. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.