Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 13:38:32 04/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2000 at 14:18:49, Chessfun wrote: >But Mogens it depends on the tone of your question as to which >personality replies. If you look carefully at what happened Sunday >I am sure you will see what I mean. :-) >Thanks. Hmmm... Should have let sleeping dogs lie. I think ironic remarks will be my downfall in the end. Since you disapprove of my behaviour this Sunday, I'll try to wipe the slate clean if I can. I admit that my remarks - albeit true - was presented in an overly sarcastic tone, which isn't appreciated by all. A scandinavian trademark I think. This was caused by the refusal on your part to address the critical remarks raised against your test and _not_ to antagonize anyone. In spite of my very unfortunate remarks, your reply nevertheless escalated the affair unnecessarily in my humble opinion. Since I don't believe in grudges and since the apology deficit is in your favour so to speak, I'll consider it a bridge under troubled waters. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.