Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:55:17 04/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2000 at 14:11:15, Ernst Walet wrote: >Analysis by Hiarcs 7.32: > >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 2.Nxe4 Rcxc2+ 3.Kd3 > +- (2.45) Depth: 1 00:00:00 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > +- (2.18) Depth: 2/11 00:00:00 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > +- (2.18) Depth: 2/14 00:00:00 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > +- (1.92) Depth: 3/14 00:00:00 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > ± (1.16) Depth: 3/17 00:00:00 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > +- (1.41) Depth: 4/17 00:00:00 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > +- (1.41) Depth: 4/19 00:00:01 >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 > +- (1.66) Depth: 5/19 00:00:02 110kN >1.Rxf5 Rxb2 2.Nxe4 Rbxc2+ 3.Kf3 > +- (1.73) Depth: 5/21 00:00:04 211kN >1.Rxf5 Bxc3 > +- (1.98) Depth: 6/21 00:00:13 567kN >1.Rxf5 g2 2.Rf6 Qh5+ 3.Kd2 Bxc3+ 4.Nxc3 Rxc3 5.bxc3 > +- (2.01) Depth: 6/23 00:00:30 1425kN >1.Rxf5 g2 > +- (1.76) Depth: 7/23 00:01:02 2876kN >1.Rxf5 g2 2.Rf6 Qh5+ 3.Kd2 Bxc3+ 4.Nxc3 Rxc3 5.Rf8+ Rc8 6.Rxc8+ Kxc8 7.Qc6+ Kb8 > +- (1.75) Depth: 7/25 00:01:28 3970kN I said: "Take the 'bm' off and run it again and you may get completely different results." And then again, you may not. ;-) Nevertheless, I have definitely seen this happen on several occasions.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.