Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:37:26 04/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2000 at 16:00:38, stuart taylor wrote: >People say that junior 6a is not tactically the greatest, and no one seems to >agree that it is the best knowledge program either! Yet it is possibly the most >succesful program (against other computers) and at worsed second best. >In Iraqouzis tournament some time ago, it looked way better than its closest >rivals.So if not knowledge or tactics, then what makes it so great? something >else? > And I wouldn't agree it has been tested properly against humans yet either. >Against humans I think it needs much more testing than against other programs, >since humans are moving objects. Some programs might be psychologically more >tricky for humans but not stronger against them necesarily.Until-of course the >human is used to it. I'm not seeing many replies. Does that mean to say "It's not"?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.