Author: Pete Galati
Date: 19:48:46 04/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2000 at 21:37:26, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 27, 2000 at 16:00:38, stuart taylor wrote: > >>People say that junior 6a is not tactically the greatest, and no one seems to >>agree that it is the best knowledge program either! Yet it is possibly the most >>succesful program (against other computers) and at worsed second best. >>In Iraqouzis tournament some time ago, it looked way better than its closest >>rivals.So if not knowledge or tactics, then what makes it so great? something >>else? >> And I wouldn't agree it has been tested properly against humans yet either. >>Against humans I think it needs much more testing than against other programs, >>since humans are moving objects. Some programs might be psychologically more >>tricky for humans but not stronger against them necesarily.Until-of course the >>human is used to it. > >I'm not seeing many replies. Does that mean to say "It's not"? All I could come up with was a snide remark like "spit shine", I figured everyone could do without it. If I decide to buy another program, Junior would be at the top of my list. I'm not very concerned with the tests. Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.