Author: blass uri
Date: 20:21:07 04/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2000 at 19:13:01, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 27, 2000 at 17:59:26, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>Why do you think I assume consistency? I don't, and never did. But I wonder if >>this difference in results between blitz and slow games is one of these fixed >>ideas we believe in without ever verfying. That's all. The results of Chessfun >>are consistent at all time controls she tried, but her slow games and the SSDF >>match are not. Just taking a look at things... >> >>Enrique > >Sorry, I misunderstood you then. AFAIK Chessfun has only published slow games >played on one computer without ponder in this forum. This is not comparable to >the results of SSDF in any way. > >Best wishes... >Mogens The main reason that it is not comperable is that chessfun used the nunn match and it is possible that crafty does nt like the nunn positions. I suspect that the nunn positions are positions that many programs do not understand and in this case the better tactical program has an advantage and positional knowledge cannot help at long time control when it can help in regular games. I am not sure about it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.