Author: Graham Laight
Date: 04:09:02 04/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
I'm sorry to be negative, especially as I'm a great believer in "new ideas", but it seems to me that the basic problem is that you have no idea what moves your opponent is going to make - therefore this scenario planning is unlikely to produce anything realistic. -g On April 27, 2000 at 21:58:09, stuart taylor wrote: >Is it possible to program a computer to set many possible future scenarios of >favourable positions possible to arrive at with same material ballance (from >that current position-some time later, even 40-60 ply's or more), then have the >program find ways how to get there? > If so, then computers will be able to plan like a top-class human! >I mean with same pieces or after various exchanges-which may be possible to >provoke purposefully or forecefully, and to weigh up pros and cons of the >outcomes of counter plans, and their possibilities of excecution, and there not >being any snags along the way. > So the program will be thinking in plans and patterns as well as in >calculations. > It would be a bit random-like at first, then the best scenarios would be >computed. etc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.