Author: Chessfun
Date: 06:41:29 04/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2000 at 09:21:59, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On April 28, 2000 at 08:59:27, Chessfun wrote: > >> >>All games on one Cel 433. >>Ponder=on. >>Tablebases used at 25 and longer. >>Nunn 1 positions. >>No opening books are loaded. >> >> 1 min game Fritz 6a 10.0 - 10.0 Crafty 17-10 >> 2 min game Fritz 6a 12.0 - 8.0 Crafty 17-10 >> 3 min game Fritz 6a 16.5 - 3.5 Crafty 17-10 >> 5 min game Fritz 6a 16.0 - 4.0 Crafty 17-10 >>10 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 running >>25 min game Fritz 6a 7.0 - 6.0 Crafty 17-10 Current score >>60 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed >>Tourney times Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed >> >>These results seem to be all over. > >Since you are using one machine and ponder on, each engine gets 50% of CPU time >and therefore you should compare these results with the ponder off results at >half the time. 2 minutes game ponder on compared to 1 minute game ponder off, >etc. > >There is still the question of the CPU time being allocated properly. I wonder >if we are proving anything like this. I think ponder=on on one cpu just don't work. IMHO that is :-) Thanks. > >Enrique > >>As anyone using F6 knows with ponder=on you get a question, >>Permanent Brain on single processor?. >> >>Thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.