Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: chain of responsibility

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 07:51:01 04/28/00

On April 27, 2000 at 19:06:52, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>Maybe I used the word "hierarchy" wrong.  What I meant is a series of handlers,
>the first ones having priority over the latter ones.

I think you mean "chain of responsibility" (GoF)?  Some time ago I thought about
this issue and decided that this was the way to handle it, and I'm glad to read
that 1) somebody actually does it! and 2) it works! :-)

Dave

Re: chain of responsibility Robert Hyatt 06:47:23 04/29/00
- Re: chain of responsibility Bruce Moreland 01:08:04 05/01/00
  - Re: chain of responsibility Robert Hyatt 07:02:29 05/02/00
    - Re: chain of responsibility Bruce Moreland 22:15:11 05/02/00
      - Re: chain of responsibility Robert Hyatt 06:43:11 05/03/00
        
        Re: chain of responsibility Robert Hyatt 06:47:04 05/03/00
        
        Re: test (please ignore) Pete Galati 21:16:07 05/03/00
        
        Re: re-test (please ignore) Pete Galati 21:17:36 05/03/00
        
        Re: OK, no, that doesn't work Pete Galati 21:20:48 05/03/00
    - Re: chain of responsibility Albert Silver 07:25:02 05/02/00
- Re: chain of responsibility David Eppstein 09:22:35 04/29/00
  - Re: chain of responsibility Robert Hyatt 13:37:22 04/29/00
  - Re: chain of responsibility Dave Gomboc 13:17:47 04/29/00
    - Re: chain of responsibility Robert Hyatt 13:42:06 04/29/00
      - Re: chain of responsibility Dave Gomboc 11:15:23 04/30/00
        
        Re: chain of responsibility Dan Newman 13:21:50 04/30/00
        
        Re: chain of responsibility Bruce Moreland 01:11:15 05/01/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.