Author: pavel
Date: 09:21:43 04/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2000 at 12:05:04, Chessfun wrote:
>On April 28, 2000 at 11:58:05, Jason Williamson wrote:
>
>>On April 28, 2000 at 08:59:27, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>All games on one Cel 433.
>>>Ponder=on.
>>>Tablebases used at 25 and longer.
>>>Nunn 1 positions.
>>>No opening books are loaded.
>>>
>>> 1 min game Fritz 6a 10.0 - 10.0 Crafty 17-10
>>> 2 min game Fritz 6a 12.0 - 8.0 Crafty 17-10
>>> 3 min game Fritz 6a 16.5 - 3.5 Crafty 17-10
>>> 5 min game Fritz 6a 16.0 - 4.0 Crafty 17-10
>>>10 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 running
>>>25 min game Fritz 6a 7.0 - 6.0 Crafty 17-10 Current score
>>>60 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed
>>>Tourney times Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed
>>>
>>>These results seem to be all over.
>>>
>>>As anyone using F6 knows with ponder=on you get a question,
>>>Permanent Brain on single processor?.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>
>>Ponder on with one cpu will only determine which program can suck up more cpu
>>power faster. ;)
>>There isn't even a guarantee that the two engines would split it 50/50.
>
>This is also my opinion.
>Thanks.
hi sarah,
I think (not sure) somewhere before in several or your posts you have
said that "you believe ponder=off does not affect crafty more than any other
programs"........but from your nun1 tests it seems that crafty is playing
"reasonably" better with ponder=on then ponder=off. I think the playing
condisions are the same except that the both programs have ponder=on in the
later series of matches. I am sorry if i missed something and posted something
wrong ;).
I know its just too small number of games to come to any conclusion. but does it
answer (to some extend) your question regarding "why does ponder=off effects
crafty?"
thanks for some great games
greetings from
pavel :)
ps, my english is not so good sorry about that.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.