Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 16:46:01 04/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2000 at 18:31:00, Ed Schröder wrote: >On April 28, 2000 at 15:20:52, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>This is what Shredder4 thinks about it. Although the score is dropping, it >>still would play Rebel´s move after 15 minutes (PIII-450, 128MB hash). >> >>Ernst. >> >> >> 7.01 0:02.53 +0.37 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng5 d5 Bd2 h6 Nf3 (192.209) 75.8 >> 7 -> 0:03.53 +0.37 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng5 d5 Bd2 h6 Nf3 (281.386) 79.5 >> 8.01 0:08.15 +0.33 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng5 Qb7 Qh3 Bd7 Be3 (657.746) 80.6 >> 8 -> 0:10.33 +0.33 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng5 Qb7 Qh3 Bd7 Be3 (846.185) 81.8 >> 9.01 0:35.75 +0.34 gxf5 exf5 Ba4 b3 Bd7 Ng5 Qc8 Ng3 h6 Nf3 (2.996.622) >>83.8 >> 9 -> 0:41.03 +0.34 gxf5 exf5 Ba4 b3 Bd7 Ng5 Qc8 Ng3 h6 Nf3 (3.465.402) >>84.4 >>10.01 1:37.23 +0.09-- gxf5 exf5 Ba4 Ne1 Nd5 Bh6 Bxh6 Qxh6 b3 axb3 c4 Rxa4 >>(8.090.297) 83.2 >>10.01 2:03.83 +0.09 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng3 Ba4 c4 bxc3 Nh5 cxb2 Qxf6 bxa1Q Qxg7+ >>Qxg7 (10.417.524) 84.1 >>10 -> 3:18.69 +0.09 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng3 Ba4 c4 bxc3 Nh5 cxb2 Qxf6 bxa1Q Qxg7+ >>(16.442.387) 82.7 >>11.01 6:06.69 0.00 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng3 Bxf3 Rxf3 Nd5 Nh5 Bd4+ Kh1 a5 Qe4 e6 >>fxe6 (30.096.440) 82.0 >>11 -> 14:57.32 0.00 gxf5 exf5 Qd7 Ng3 Bxf3 Rxf3 Nd5 Nh5 Bd4+ Kh1 a5 Qe4 e6 >>(72.849.984) 81.1 > >My latest version needs 30 minutes to change its mind from gxf5 >to Qb6 and 3 minutes later to e5 which seems to me the best defending >move in this position. Anybody understands why programs tend to gxf5? >The move weakens the king pawn shelter any I am pretty sure all programs >have a (huge?) penalty for that. So there must be a reason why this move >is favored. What's the angle? > >Ed Could be because it looks like it will break up White's centre pawn formation? *** Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.