Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:42:22 04/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2000 at 14:17:01, Chessfun wrote: >On April 28, 2000 at 14:11:18, pavel wrote: > >>On April 28, 2000 at 13:59:38, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>All games on one Cel 433. >>>Ponder=on. >>>Tablebases used at 25 and longer. >>>Nunn 1 positions. >>>No opening books are loaded. >>> >>> 1 min game Fritz 6a 10.0 - 10.0 Crafty 17-10 >>> 2 min game Fritz 6a 12.0 - 8.0 Crafty 17-10 >>> 3 min game Fritz 6a 16.5 - 3.5 Crafty 17-10 >>> 5 min game Fritz 6a 16.0 - 4.0 Crafty 17-10 >>>10 min game Fritz 6a 15.0 - 5.0 Crafty 17-10 >>>25 min game Fritz 6a 12.0 - 8.0 Crafty 17-10 >>>60 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed >>>Tourney times Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed >>> >>>As I said in the original thread and others I don't >>>think cpu utilization is equal but figured since I played >>>the other two matches out 10 and 25 I would post the score. >>> >>>Thanks. >> >>hi sarah!! >> the cpu utilization not being equal is not anyone's fault. If it is >>the case then all that can be said is "crafty has a better code for such case,or >>fritz has a bad code for such case". but to tell the truth, if you think about >>it, its more or less the same as "crafty not having a better code for >>ponder=off......where as fritz having a better code, thus making crafty more >>likely to affect on ponder=off games" just my thoughts. > > >I can't see it that way. If ponder=off then when it is the turn to move >the program has full cpu utilization. With ponder=on on one cpu it is likely >that one of any two programs will take more than 50%. There are others far >more qualified than I to answer the cpu question I just can't see how with >ponder=on it would ever be the same. If both engines are running, the cpu utilization must be roughly 50% each. That is what operating system process schedulers are all about. Unless you somehow freak the works by changing priorities manually. There are certainly windows utilities that will tell you what percent of the cpu each process is getting. > > >>I have discussed more about this on the other thread that we were having before. >>thanks again for great test :) >>pavel > >Welcome again :-) > >> >>ps, pls dont think i am keeping on repling your post because i like to pull your >>legs ;0 >>its just that i like to discuss on the current issue ;).....and is as much as >>interested on it as you are. >>as always sorry for my english ;0 > >It is a good subject matter I think. >Interesting at least the ponder=on or ponder=off subject. >As usual don't worry about your English !!. > >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.