Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 20:11:46 04/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2000 at 12:05:04, Chessfun wrote: >On April 28, 2000 at 11:58:05, Jason Williamson wrote: > >>On April 28, 2000 at 08:59:27, Chessfun wrote: >> >>> >>>All games on one Cel 433. >>>Ponder=on. >>>Tablebases used at 25 and longer. >>>Nunn 1 positions. >>>No opening books are loaded. >>> >>> 1 min game Fritz 6a 10.0 - 10.0 Crafty 17-10 >>> 2 min game Fritz 6a 12.0 - 8.0 Crafty 17-10 >>> 3 min game Fritz 6a 16.5 - 3.5 Crafty 17-10 >>> 5 min game Fritz 6a 16.0 - 4.0 Crafty 17-10 >>>10 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 running >>>25 min game Fritz 6a 7.0 - 6.0 Crafty 17-10 Current score >>>60 min game Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed >>>Tourney times Fritz 6a - Crafty 17-10 Unplayed >>> >>>These results seem to be all over. >>> >>>As anyone using F6 knows with ponder=on you get a question, >>>Permanent Brain on single processor?. >>> >>>Thanks >> >>Ponder on with one cpu will only determine which program can suck up more cpu >>power faster. ;) >>There isn't even a guarantee that the two engines would split it 50/50. > >This is also my opinion. >Thanks. I think there are programs that you can get for Windows that will tell you how much CPU time each process is using. I know that Windows NT (and presumably 2000) has a rudimentary version of this feature built-in. I still consider ponder=on games sloppy if they're on the same computer. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.