Author: Chessfun
Date: 21:32:35 04/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2000 at 00:23:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 29, 2000 at 22:42:14, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 29, 2000 at 22:17:01, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On April 29, 2000 at 19:09:23, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>All games on Two Cel 433's. >>>>Ponder=on. >>>>Tablebases used at 25 and longer. >>>>Nunn 1 positions. >>>>No opening books are loaded. >>>> >>>> 1 min game Fritz 6a 18.0 - 2.0 Crafty 17-10 >>>> >>>> >>>>Fritz clearly also benefits by ponder=on at blitz maybe even >>>>more than Crafty as it seems to see deeper into the line. >>> >>>Do I dare ask the question? Yes, I think I do. On the basis of what results do >>>you ponder that conclusion? >> >>I watched all 20 games and saw the depth of each program and the eval >>of each. >>Thanks. >> >> >> > > >Depth isn't really something you can compare. IE compare the search depth >of Hiarcs to the search depth of Junior, to get the point. Naturally you are correct, I knew when I posted it was a mistake since it would naturally depend on the search width as well as depth and Hiarcs is a good example of that. Thanks. > > >> >> >>> >>>Sincerely, >>>Mogens Chr. Larsen >>>http://home1.stofanet.dk/Moq/ >>> >>>"If virtue can't be mine alone, >>>at least my faults can be my own."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.