Author: Ian Brooks
Date: 15:05:22 05/01/00
Forgive me if this is a common question, I don't read here often. Which program performs best in complicated endings, particularly endings with material imbalance? I have experience with several that obviously do not "understand" the long term consequences of certain actions. For example in a position of R+B+P v R+3P it seems pretty obvious that if the side with the B is trying to win, losing the pawn is a very bad idea, even if it means winning 2 or 3 of the opponents pawns. As a follow up, do tablebases make much difference in these type of endings? Thanks Ian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.