Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Reproducibility of Nunn matches is not so good

Author: Jouni Uski

Date: 23:03:12 05/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 02, 2000 at 01:54:47, Pete Galati wrote:

>On May 02, 2000 at 01:10:58, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>About one week ago I posted "sensational" blitz Nunn test result Crafty17.10 -
>>Fritz6a 12-8. And I wasn't lying! Now I have more time to re-check and second
>>match ended 9 - 11 for Fritz. I also repeated two other matches with interesting
>>results:
>>                           1.              2.
>>Crafty 17.10 - Lg2000   13 - 7         9,5 - 10,5
>>Fritz6a - Lg2000        13,5 - 6,5     11 - 9
>>
>>Exact enviroment: AMD 450Mhz, ponder of, 16+16MB hash, 4m+1s level, 3+4+some
>>5 piece TBs, Fritz6 interface, early resign.
>>
>>Conclusion: after 20 games You don't know much yet...
>>
>>Jouni
>
>I think your conclusion is correct, 20 games wouldn't be enough.  If I'm reading
> your results the right way, Little Goliath won more games against both of it's
>opponents in the second tests.  Does this posibly mean that LGoliath learns
>better than Crafty and Fritz?  I don't know, I'm only asking.  Or again, is it
>too few games to tell?
>
>Pete

I test with LG2000 (and other engines) with learn off always.

Jouni




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.