Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 23:18:11 05/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2000 at 23:29:54, Chessfun wrote: >Once again you make unclear insinuations, with neither detail nor >specifics. Shenanigan's was meant as a humourous remark not as an insult, but I admit that it can be misinterpreted as an accusation of foul play. It wasn't intended as such. I just like the word, because it reminds me of gangster films. Oh well, I digress. When you post there's problems with the results, learning, chessbase GUI and autoplayer and still continue to reach conclusions about strength, you're wrong. When you make a special test, where you select the parameters, you can't draw general conclusion to the playing strength. That isn't my opinion, that's a fact. >Then maybe you should do run them, then you won't need to worry about >shenanigan's going on. >Thanks. I cannot and wouldn't if I could, which I explained in an earlier post. http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?108643 Sincerely, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.