Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:24:59 05/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2000 at 02:00:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 01, 2000 at 23:23:18, Chessfun wrote: > >>On May 01, 2000 at 19:20:46, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>What selectivity of results? please specify what you are talking about. >>I clearly stated I had a problem with the autoplayer after Uri's post. >>I posted at day one anyone wanting the games email me. >>I got one request. > >I was referring to 5/0 results, where you went through the cycle twice. You >assumed that the 11-9 was wrong, when there's nothing to suggest that at all. No you are to busy reading Dr. Hyatt's posts. You assume I assumed. When in fact I assumed something was wrong based on two different results 15-5 and 11-9. Had Crafty the first set 11-9 without the second set happening I wouldn't have questioned it at all. >>Suspicious of what? please be specific as I don't want say something >>against something unsaid. >>Thanks. > >I'm not sure you're absolutely unbiased. Partly because you claim that your test >answers questions that it doesn't. But I've adressed that in several posts, as >well as the problems with the test itself. Unbiased? what does that mean that I would make false scores, to support my opinion that Crafty cannot beat F6a in Nunn 1. If it don't mean that then I don't see your point. As stated elsewhere I check all games. You naturally have the option to play the games yourself or to have requested the games and looked at them in detail. Your posts are always critical but you never address either the content of the actual games themselves nor any facts supporting what you say. The games are hard data and IMO that is worth more than just hearing I am biased. I don't think I make any claim if I have please specify. I have stated my opinion at various points but have not stated as I recall anything odd that others do not and have not agreed with. And how is being unbiased related to making any claims that Nunn 1 answers. Whether it is your opinion that it answers no questions, it answers some for others. But it is just that _your_ opinion. There are NO problems with Nunn. In your opinion it don't answer questions but in mine it does. Thanks. >Sincerely, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.