Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:30:53 05/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2000 at 02:26:31, blass uri wrote: >On May 02, 2000 at 02:00:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On May 01, 2000 at 23:23:18, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2000 at 19:20:46, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>What selectivity of results? please specify what you are talking about. >>>I clearly stated I had a problem with the autoplayer after Uri's post. >>>I posted at day one anyone wanting the games email me. >>>I got one request. >> >>I was referring to 5/0 results, where you went through the cycle twice. You >>assumed that the 11-9 was wrong, when there's nothing to suggest that at all. > >She did not assume that the 11-9 was wrong but that one of the result was wrong. >It is also logical always to suspect more that the second result is wrong if you >have 2 results. Thank you....someone gets it. > >After a third nunn match she found that the result was again 15-5 and it is an >evidence that the 11-9 was wrong. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.